|
|
Workplace training versus traditional classroom trainingTeaching in the classroom and teaching or training in the workplace may seem, to the inexperienced eye, to be one in the same technique. A person gets up in front of a group and imparts information to them. The group is them tested or evaluated in some manner to determine what has been learned. Although some of the techniques used for each may have some resemblance, there are numerous differences between the two.Similarities A learning process is expected to take place. A building process, moving from simple to more complex concepts. Learning is to be applied in some manner. Differences Traditional Classroom Theory-based applications Teacher/student relationship Standardized learning objectives (often mandated by the state) Grade based Little or no feedback given by students Taught one way Subject based Done, once course has ended No focus on the “self” Teacher has small stake in whether subject is learned No bearing on job performance Workplace Training Real world applications Peer/colleague relationship Objectives based on organizational targets & goals No grades Evaluation of class by attendees Flexibility in teaching styles Idea/concept based May revisit topic as needed Assists in the self-actualization process Learning is a win-win situation for organization and attendees Seeks to improve job performance
|